Commonwealth v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Electronic interception of oral conversations is lawful when accompanied by the consent of one of the parties to the conversation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Schaeffer
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 76×
• Commonwealth v. Wright
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-01· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Benchino
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-25· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Whiting
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-09· cited 7×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Hassine
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-08· cited 67×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-09-27· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. McGuire
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-22· cited 26×
• Commonwealth v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-11-09· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Lee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-29· cited 19×
• Commonwealth Ex Rel. Romanowicz v. Romanowicz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-12-11· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Harvey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-20· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Clapps
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-07-17· cited 7×