Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 10/20/1978
Commonwealth v. Fowler
Citations
- 393 A.2d 844
- 259 Pa. Super. 314
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3803
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding failure to request continuance after amendment to information supports -9- J-S24027-21 conclusion that amendment caused no prejudice
- finding failure to request -6- J-S62013-19 continuance after information amended supports a conclusion that amendment caused no prejudice
- failure to request continuance after information amended indicates that amendment caused no prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Watkins, Jacobs, Hoffman, Cercone, Price, Van Voort Spaeth, Van Voort, Spaeth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-06· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. WomackSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-30· cited 40×
- Com. v. Sandoval, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-12-14· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. OatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-31· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. EdmondsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-01-19· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. AndrasikLawrence County Court of Common Pleas· 1992-11-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.