Commonwealth v. Fooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that “the appellee’s failure to file a timely motion to 5 Shatzer argues that his right to a speedy trial was violated under Rule 600(A
• determining that “the appellee’s failure to file a timely motion to dismiss prior to the commencement of trial renders his Rule [600] claim waived, and, in effect, super[s]edes any alleged impropriety on the part of the Commonwealth.”
• trial commences for purpose of Rule 1100 when jury is empaneled or voir dire has begun

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).