Commonwealth v. Figuereo, K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting, in contract case applying Missouri law, that the successful party was entitled to recover attorneys’ fees “only for work done in furthering the contract claim”
• “[T]hough not dispositive, the fact that the jury awarded different amounts on each claim suggests that the jury did not intend to duplicate the award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).