Commonwealth v. Fell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inside information — “a specific familiarity with [the person’s] affairs provides corroboration for reasonable suspicion.”
• “[b]ecause an anonymous tip typically carries a low degree of reliability, more information is usually required before investigating officers develop the reasonable suspicion needed to support an investigatory stop of a suspect”
• in turn quoting Arizona v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 330 (1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-14· cited 64×
• Commonwealth v. Griffin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-07-29· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Joseph
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-12-20· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Emeigh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-08-08· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-06-30· cited 2×
• Com. v. Davis, N.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-14
• Commonwealth v. Husky
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 2010-08-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Alabama v. White
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
• Commonwealth v. Melendez
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-05-22· cited 195×
• Commonwealth v. Wimbush
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-17· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-20· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Goodwin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-17· cited 24×