Commonwealth v. Faulk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claim that trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s request to proceed pro se was waived for PCRA review when appellant failed to raise the claim on direct appeal
• No constitutional right to hybrid representation exists.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Buterbaugh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-05-13· cited 510×
• Com. v. Wyatt, G.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-10-24

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Commonwealth v. Ali
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-12-29· cited 675×
• Commonwealth v. Ellis
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-05-27· cited 319×
• Commonwealth v. Martin
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-08-17· cited 308×
• Commonwealth v. Steele
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-18· cited 284×
• Commonwealth v. Ligons
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-05-27· cited 218×
• Commonwealth v. Fletcher
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-28· cited 172×
• Commonwealth v. Davido
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-25· cited 114×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-17· cited 89×
• Commonwealth v. El
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-08-20· cited 64×
• In Re Scheidmantel
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-05· cited 55×
• Commonwealth v. Faulk
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-06-15· cited 53×