Commonwealth v. Farris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating there was \little doubt\ that jury took detective's testimony that he arrested defendant after he interviewed witness to mean that witness implicated defendant
• disparaging effectiveness of formulation “as a result of information received ...”
• indirect hearsay where detective testified that accomplice to robbery made statement to him, as result of which he arrested defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dent
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-11-25· cited 149×
• Head v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-27· cited 135×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-24· cited 40×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-07-11· cited 38×
• Commonwealth v. Underwood
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Perry
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-06-27· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Whiting
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-18· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Bunch
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-25· cited 18×
• Commonwealth v. Robinson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-07-17· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-08-31· cited 11×