Commonwealth v. Fanelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Before a court can vacate or modify an Order on reconsideration, all parties must have notice and an opportunity to be heard
• Commonwealth does not have to exhaust every conceivable avenue open to it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Daniels
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-01-23· cited 350×
• Commonwealth v. McKendrick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-08-18· cited 50×
• Commonwealth v. DeMarco
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-07-27· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Nicodemus
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-12-03· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Laurie
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-26· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Singleton
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-29· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Pichini
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 6×
• Commonwealth v. Badger
  Northampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1984-12-12