Commonwealth v. Fales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutors permitted to question witnesses regarding time frame and manner of victim’s disclosures where circumstances of complaint first developed in cross-examination; testimony admissible as relevant to victim’s state of mind, not as “fresh complaint” testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. King
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-29· cited 211×
• Commonwealth v. Hall
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2006-06-02· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Grimbilas
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2018-03-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Saferian
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1974-07-30· cited 1,208×
• Commonwealth v. Dougan
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-02-14· cited 90×
• Commonwealth v. Errington
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-01-25· cited 68×
• Commonwealth v. Richardson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-07-15· cited 58×
• Commonwealth v. Breese
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-06-26· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Dutra
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1983-03-29· cited 9×