Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/29/1978
Commonwealth v. Ervin
Citations
- 396 A.2d 776
- 262 Pa. Super. 322
- 1978 Pa. Super. LEXIS 4260
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- it is always the right of a party to show that a witness has an interest in the outcome of the trial
- it is always the right of a party to show that a witness has an interest in the outcome of the trial
- error to disallow cross examination designed to establish that there was “bad blood” between the witness and defendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Voort, Spaeth, Hester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-11· cited 102×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-12-19· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. KatsafanasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-08-05· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. LoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. LobelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-01-22· cited 21×
- Commonwealth v. FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-07-22· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. CessnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-02-01· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. BlountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-25· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. RossSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-27· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-09-29· cited 8×
- Commonwealth v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-09-21· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.