Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Ellison

Citations

  • 902 A.2d 419
  • 588 Pa. 1
  • 2006 Pa. LEXIS 1287

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, “a criminal defendant's right to an impartial jury is explicitly granted by Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and the jury selection process is crucial to the preservation of that right”
  • the sole purpose of examination of jurors under voir dire is to secure a competent, fair, impartial and unprejudiced jury
  • “It is well settled that the sole purpose of examination of jurors under voir dire is to secure a competent, fair, impartial and unprejudiced jury.”
  • “The purpose of voir dire is to provide an opportunity to counsel to assess the qualifications of the prospective jurors to serve. It is therefore appropriate to use such an examination to disclose fixed opinions or to expose other reasons for disqualification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cappy, Castille, Newman, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Baldwin, Gappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.