Commonwealth v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• successive steps of possession, possession with intent to deliver, and delivery of controlled substance necessarily involve one another, merge
• successive steps of possession, possession with intent to deliver, and delivery of controlled substance necessarily involve one another, merge
• \Delivery necessarily includes possession with the intent to deliver and possession with the intent to deliver clearly includes possession. The charges are therefore merged for sentencing purposes. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-19· cited 85×
• Commonwealth v. Eicher
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-29· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Johnston
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-05-07· cited 17×
• Commonwealth v. Constantine
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-06-22· cited 16×
• Commonwealth v. Neidig
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-03-15· cited 15×
• Com. v. Ramsey, E.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Turner
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-27· cited 33×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-11· cited 27×
• Commonwealth v. Wojciechowski
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-02-20· cited 23×
• Commonwealth v. Everett
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-09-04· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Williams
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-06-30· cited 5×