· 10/11/2022
Commonwealth v. Durham, G.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the absurdity canon applies in only \exceedingly rare\ cases
- noting the absurdity canon applies only in the \ 'exceedingly rare case' \ (quoting Schatz v. Interfaith Care Ctr. , 811 N.W.2d 643 , 651 (Minn. 2012) )
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.