Commonwealth v. Durham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When KRS 532,080 is applied to determine the maximum- aggregate -penalty, as opposed to being used to enhance a penalty, the appropriate reference in a case where the underlying felonies are Class D or C felonies is to subsection (6)(b) rather than to subsection (5).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Myers v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 22×
• Michael Lesem v. Liane Mouradian
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2013-07-02· cited 10×
• Eldridge v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-12-23· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dawson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1988-09-08· cited 18×
• Hendley v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1978-10-31· cited 17×
• Milner v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1983-07-22· cited 3×
• Roy Karem George v. William C. Seabold
  Sixth Circuit· 1990-09-10· cited 1×