Commonwealth v. Dukulah

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a civil litigant’s right to confront litigants is “founded upon notions of procedural due process” rather than the Confrontation Clause
• holding “the alleged abuser’s due process right to cross-examine the child is adequately protected by the unavailability and reliability requirements of’ Alaska’s counterpart to Ariz. R. Evid. 804
• explaining that the unavailable declar-ant hearsay exceptions in Rule 804 relate to \statements which are sufficiently reliable to be admitted in light of their great evidentiary value\
• explaining that the unavailable declarant hearsay exceptions in Rule 804 relate to “statements which are sufficiently reliable to be admitted in light of their great evidentiary value”
• distinguishing between the adjudicatory and dispositional phases of “Children in Need of Aid” proceedings
• distinguishing between the adjudicatory and dispositional phases of \Children in Need of Aid\ proceedings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).