Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 7/30/1996
Commonwealth v. Drake
Citations
- 681 A.2d 1357
- 452 Pa. Super. 315
- 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2504
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that this Court will not become the counsel for an appellant, “and will not, therefore, consider issues . . . which are not fully developed in [the] brief[ ]”
- results from tests requiring appellant to count fingers back and forth with thumb and recite alphabet are admissible because ordinary observer can form opinion as to whether individual is results: (1
- “An appellate brief must provide citations to the record and to any relevant supporting authority. This Court will not become the counsel for an appellant, ‘and will not, therefore, consider issues ... which are not fully developed in [the] brief.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Eakin, Olszewski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BowenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-11-01· cited 246×
- Commonwealth v. GouldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-12-01· cited 172×
- Commonwealth v. EinhornSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-14· cited 136×
- Cole v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-11-02· cited 6×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-11-22· cited 233×
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-30· cited 160×
- Commonwealth v. FoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-09-16· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-21· cited 63×
- Commonwealth v. BowserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-04-14· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. MicklosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-02-28· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. CaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-20· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. WolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-11-01· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. RaganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-20· cited 29×
- Goodman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. Rosario-HernandezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-09-20· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. McConnellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-04-11· cited 11×
- Grabish v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-27· cited 7×
- Krall v. PennsylvaniaE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-11-01· cited 6×
- Commonwealth v. PethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-06-16· cited 3×
- Patterson v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-10· cited 3×
- Bowser v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1994-10-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.