Commonwealth v. Doolin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant waived his claim by failing to adequately develop his argument or provide citation to and discussion of relevant authority
• “[W]e cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by granting [the witness] a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege in this case.”
• internal citations, quotations, and original brackets omitted; emphasis in original
• “It is well settled that the decision to grant a pretrial motion to dismiss a criminal charge is vested in the sound discretion of the trial court and may be - 52 - J-M07001-19 overturned only upon a showing of abuse of discretion or error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).