Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 5/15/1981

Commonwealth v. Dodge

Citations

429 A.2d 1143
287 Pa. Super. 148
1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing that a defendant “does not have standing to object to the constitutionality of a statute unless he is affected by the particular feature alleged to be in conflict with the constitution”
providing that a defendant “does not have standing to object to the constitutionality of a statute unless he is affected by the particular feature alleged to be in conflict with the constitution”
no standing to object to constitutionality of statute unless one is affected by particular feature alleged to be unconstitutional
no standing to object to constitutionality of statute unless one is affected by particular feature alleged to be unconstitutional
where a vagueness challenge does not implicate First Amendment freedoms of speech, association, or assembly, the definiteness of a statute will be decided in light of the conduct in which the party challenging the statute has engaged.
where a vagueness challenge does not implicate First Amendment freedoms of speech, association, or assembly, the definiteness of a statute will be decided in light of the conduct in which the party challenging the statute has engaged.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spaeth, Wickersham, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.