· 1/11/1989
Commonwealth v. Doa
Citations
- 553 A.2d 416
- 381 Pa. Super. 181
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing evidentiary law pre-codification of the Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence and finding that a witness need not be able to identify the defendant at trial for prior identification to be substantively admitted via the testimony of a police officer
- trial court did not err in allowing assistant district attorney who handled prosecution of defendant at preliminary hearing to later testify at defendant’s trial when testifying assistant district attorney was not functioning in the dual capacity of witness and advocate
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, McEwen, Melinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.