Commonwealth v. Dilbeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• on appeal, appellant’s pro se brief raised issues concerning trial counsel’s effectiveness; the court remanded for appointment of new counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Dilbeck
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-17· cited 85×
• Commonwealth v. Cooke
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-06-19· cited 16×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Commonwealth v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-03-15· cited 155×
• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-16· cited 39×
• Robert Lynn Smith v. United States
  Eighth Circuit· 1967-11-01· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Rightnour
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-09-19· cited 2×