Commonwealth v. Dickerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[O]ne would be quite naive to believe the jury could not reasonably infer the photographs were `mug shots'.\
• “[O]ne would be quite naive to believe the jury could not reasonably infer the photographs were ‘mug shots’.”
• Three Judge Panel, Per Curiam
• Three Judge Panel, Per Curiam

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-06-30· cited 25×
• Commonwealth v. Reiss
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-11-05· cited 9×
• Commonwealth v. Ginnery
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-07

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-06-28· cited 242×