Commonwealth v. D'ENTREMONT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• officer’s statement of availability should the defendant want to talk was “neither confrontational nor inquisitional”
• no interrogation where officer stated to defendant in prison that although he [the defendant] refused to discuss case without counsel, she [the officer] was available if he changed his mind
• after invoking his right to counsel, police told the defendant that they had spoken to the victim and would be willing to speak to him if he changed his mind, whereupon the defendant proceeded to “tell... his side of the story”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).