Commonwealth v. Dengler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with out-of-state cases and holding “that psychological or psychiatric testimony of an expert at an SVP proceeding is not novel scientific evidence subject to Frye”
• expert psychologist’s opinion whether sex offender met criteria for sexually violent predator was not novel scientific evidence subject to Frye
• expert psychologist’s opinion whether sex offender met criteria for sexually violent predator was not novel scientific evidence subject to Frye

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).