Skip to main content
· 6/28/2001

Commonwealth v. Deaner

Citations

  • 779 A.2d 578
  • 2001 Pa. Super. 191
  • 2001 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1310

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that petition to transfer or modify sentence due to illness is not cognizable under the PCRA
  • stating that Section 81 is \not intended to address alleged general shortcomings in the provision of medical care in the state prison system\
  • stating that a collateral petition that raises an issue that the PCRA statute could remedy is to be considered a PCRA petition
  • concluding a collateral petition that raises an issue that the PCRA statute could remedy is to be considered a PCRA petition
  • finding that a collateral petition that raises an issue that the PCRA statute could remedy is to be considered a PCRA petition
  • [stating that] a collateral petition that raises an issue that the PCRA statute could remedy is to be considered a PCRA petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Melvin, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.