Commonwealth v. D'Collanfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that claim challenging validity of guilty plea waived where appellant neither objected during colloquy nor challenged it in post-sentence motion
• holding appellant waived challenge to validity of his guilty plea where he failed to initially challenge guilty plea in post-sentence motion
• instructing that claim challenging validity of guilty plea waived where -5- J-S69036-17 appellant neither objected during colloquy nor challenged it in post-sentence motion
• finding that nine e-mail communications of a harassing nature were sufficient to establish intent to cause substantial emotional distress under 18Pa.C.S. §5504(a.l) (repealed
• noting that the appellant’s claim challenging the validity of guilty plea was waived because the appellant neither objected during colloquy nor challenged it in a post-sentence motion
• noting that the appellant’s claim challenging the validity of guilty plea was waived because the appellant neither objected during colloquy nor challenged it in a post-sentence motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).