Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 9/28/1979
Commonwealth v. Davis
Citations
- 411 A.2d 250
- 270 Pa. Super. 202
- 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Commonwealth must prove exigent circumstances by clear and convincing evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Price, Gates, Dowling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BentleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-03-07· cited 43×
- Commonwealth v. MintonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-04-03· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. WeikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-02-10· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. IonataSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-22· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-03-13· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. RispoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-25· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. GinterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-17· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. ZockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-03-29· cited 9×
- Commonwealth v. RoweSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-11-12· cited 4×
- Commonwealth v. McKownCentre County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-04-28
- Commonwealth v. BrantleyDelaware County Court of Common Pleas· 2012-05-22
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-12-20· cited 1,736×
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-04-16· cited 463×
- Commonwealth v. KunkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-04-13· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. MaioneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-04-03· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. BermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-12-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.