Commonwealth v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[O]ur Supreme Court has held that where the PCRA petition is untimely, the failure to provide such notice is not reversible error.”
• timeliness requirement of the PCRA is “mandatory and jurisdictional in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Boyd
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-05-02· cited 573×
• Commonwealth v. Lawson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-04-08· cited 514×
• Commonwealth v. Perrin
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-01· cited 218×
• Commonwealth v. McKeever
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-04-21· cited 200×
• Commonwealth v. Johnson
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-03-03· cited 46×
• Commonwealth v. Green
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-11· cited 13×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Commonwealth v. Carr
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-02-22· cited 670×
• Commonwealth v. Lark
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-02-23· cited 546×
• Commonwealth v. Pursell
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-04-17· cited 250×
• Commonwealth v. Rollins
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-09-29· cited 208×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-09-16· cited 53×