Commonwealth v. Darosa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Nothing in . . . the [G]uideline provision . . . accounted for the possession of . . . substantial quantities of ammunition[] and/or multiple high-capacity magazines.\
• same regarding eighty-nine rounds across - 17 - four magazines, two of which were high-capacity magazines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).