Commonwealth v. Daniels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Anders brief which complies substantially with the requirements of Turner/Finley is sufficient to permit withdrawal of counsel
• “We now turn to an independent review of Appellant’s PCRA petition to ascertain whether his claim entitles him to relief.”
• “We now turn to an independent review of Appellant’s PCRA petition to ascertain whether his claim entitles him to relief.”
• where counsel incorrectly sought leave to withdraw on collateral appeal pursuant to Anders, Court could proceed to address merits because Anders brief complied with Turner/Finley procedure
• this Court may affirm an order denying PCRA relief on any ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Widgins
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-09-29· cited 411×
• Commonwealth v. Doty
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-29· cited 249×
• Commonwealth v. Muzzy
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-03-31· cited 240×
• Commonwealth v. Carter
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-05-26· cited 179×
• Com. v. Howard, M.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2022-11-09· cited 83×
• Commonwealth v. McDermitt
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-13· cited 80×
• Commonwealth v. Harris
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-04-22· cited 76×
• Commonwealth v. Lawrence
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-10-31· cited 55×