Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Daniel

Citations

  • 30 A.3d 494
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 214
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \the term 'unreasonable' generally means a decision that is either irrational or not guided by sound judgment\
  • holding trial court’s reasons did not justify 11½ – 23 month sentence for aggravated assault
  • holding the Commonwealth’s allegations, inter alia, that a sentence “was unreasonably lenient, was dependent upon improper factors…, [and] disregarded the serious nature of the offenses,” posed a substantial question for review
  • holding the Commonwealth's allegations, inter alia, that a sentence “was unreasonably lenient, was dependent upon improper factors ..., [and] disregarded the serious nature of the offenses,” posed a substantial question for review
  • concluding sentencing court's failure to take into account the extremely serious nature and circumstances of the offenses and the defendant's failure to accept responsibility in fashioning a sentence that was a downward departure from the guidelines was irrational and unsound
  • allegation that court unreasonably sentenced outside guidelines raises substantial question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Bowes, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.