Commonwealth v. Dancy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \We interpret the plain language of this section to require a finding that § 10 [ a ] or § 10 [ c ] has been violated before the penalty enhancement provision in § 10 [ n ] can apply\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-05-22· cited 34×
• COMMONWEALTH v. WAYNE FOREMAN.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2022-07-20· cited 10×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2017-03-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bronstein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1984-01-05· cited 99×
• Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2008-08-13· cited 49×
• Commonwealth v. Williamson
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-07-09· cited 42×
• Commonwealth v. Loadholt
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2011-10-11· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Loadholt
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2010-03-31· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Young
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2009-05-04· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Charles
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-10-26· cited 3×