Commonwealth v. Curry
Citations
- 4 Pa. Super. 356
- 1897 Pa. Super. LEXIS 126
Syllabus
<p>Statutes — Construction of — Constitutional inhibition.</p> <p>Acts of assembly are to be construed liberally in respect to constitutional inhibitions rather than to embarrass by a construction of a strictness unnecessary to the accomplishment of the beneficial purposes for which such inhibition is imposed.</p> <p>Constitutional law — Title of act of June 26, 1895, sufficient.</p> <p>The Act of June 26, 1895, P. L. 817, known as the Pure Food Act is constitutional. The title to this act fairly gives notice of the provisions of the act so as reasonably to lead to an inquiry into the bill; it invites examination by the very words used.</p> <p>Statutes — The legislature may define terms raised by it.</p> <p>A construction put upon an act of the legislature itself, by means of a provision embodied in the same, that it shall or shall not be construed in a certain designated manner, is binding upon the courts although the latter without such a direction would have understood the language to mean something different.</p> <p>Criminal law — Adulteration of food — Act of 1895.</p> <p>The selling of “ cotton seed oil” in packages labeled and marked “olive oil” is adulteration within the meaning of the Act of June 26, 1895, P. L. 317, as defined by clause 4, of section 3 of said act.</p>
Judges: Beaver, Bice, Orlady, Reeder, Smith, Wickham, Willard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. MintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-02-14· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. MassiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1963-03-19· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. CobleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-01-18· cited 11×
- Overseers of the Poor v. County of ArmstrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1899-07-28· cited 7×
- Commonwealth v. LightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-02-28· cited 4×
- Mt. Carmel Borough v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-12-13· cited 3×
- McElhone v. Philadelphia Quartette ClubSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-03-06· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. FultonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1918-07-10· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. KebortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1904-11-21· cited 2×
- Hallman v. Montgomery CountyMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1924-08-27· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. SpencerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1905-07-13
- Commonwealth v. ArowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-10-05
- McMullin v. PhillipsPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1924-06-23
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Borough of Millvale v. Evergreen Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1890-01-06· cited 23×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Cambria County v. LloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-05-28· cited 22×
- Chunk v. McGeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1876-05-08· cited 21×
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1881-01-03· cited 17×
- Philadelphia & Erie Railroad v. Catawissa RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1866-02-26· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-07-16· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MuirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1897-01-25· cited 12×
- Commonwealth ex rel. Cambria County v. LloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-11-11· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.