Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cruz

Citations

  • 919 A.2d 279
  • 2007 Pa. Super. 56
  • 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 298

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that evidence the appellant shot the victim in the back with a firearm was sufficient to support an inference of malice and specific intent to kill
  • finding that evidence that the defendant shot the victim in the back with a firearm was sufficient to support an inference of malice and specific intent to kill
  • stating that “[t]he finder of fact is the exclusive judge of the weight of the evidence[,] as the fact finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented and determines the credibility of the witnesses.”
  • stating that “[t]he finder of fact is the exclusive judge of the weight of the evidence[,] as the fact finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented[,] and determines the credibility of the witnesses.”
  • “A defendant is guilty of first[-]degree murder when, with the specific intent to kill, he causes the death of another person.”
  • “Evidence that the defendant shot the victim in the back with a handgun is sufficient to permit an inference of malice and specific intent to kill.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Klein, Panella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.