Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 3/5/2007
Commonwealth v. Cruz
Citations
- 919 A.2d 279
- 2007 Pa. Super. 56
- 2007 Pa. Super. LEXIS 298
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that evidence the appellant shot the victim in the back with a firearm was sufficient to support an inference of malice and specific intent to kill
- finding that evidence that the defendant shot the victim in the back with a firearm was sufficient to support an inference of malice and specific intent to kill
- stating that “[t]he finder of fact is the exclusive judge of the weight of the evidence[,] as the fact finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented and determines the credibility of the witnesses.”
- stating that “[t]he finder of fact is the exclusive judge of the weight of the evidence[,] as the fact finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence presented[,] and determines the credibility of the witnesses.”
- “A defendant is guilty of first[-]degree murder when, with the specific intent to kill, he causes the death of another person.”
- “Evidence that the defendant shot the victim in the back with a handgun is sufficient to permit an inference of malice and specific intent to kill.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevens, Klein, Panella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. BoydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-08-14· cited 132×
- Commonwealth v. CrosleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-02-28· cited 100×
- Commonwealth v. TorittoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-05-16· cited 97×
- Commonwealth v. FoleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-15· cited 76×
- Commonwealth v. ChineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-02-13· cited 65×
- Com. v. Pledger, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-02-20
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. ChampneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-24· cited 563×
- Marquez-Urquidi v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 155×
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-10-14· cited 129×
- Commonwealth v. PassmoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-08-30· cited 105×
- Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-11-21· cited 58×
- Commonwealth v. HargraveSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-10· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-17· cited 48×
- Com. v. PassmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-02-10· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. DerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-01-15· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-03-15· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.