Commonwealth v. Crowson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no burglary where “no evidence that [the defendant] entered the ... residence surreptitiously or by force” and in fact “no evidence at all regarding the manner of entry by appellant.”
• no burglary where \no evidence that [the defendant] entered the . . . residence surreptitiously or by force\ and in fact \no evidence at all regarding the manner of entry by appellant.\
• although victim’s television set and lamp were found in defendant’s apartment the day after break-in, conviction for burglary vacated because no evidence regarding manner of entry from which felonious intent might be inferred
• although victim's television set and lamp were found in defendant's apartment the day after break-in, conviction for burglary vacated because no evidence regarding manner of entry from which felonious intent might be inferred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jacoby, T., Aplt.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-09-28· cited 229×
• Commonwealth v. Tessel
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-10-25· cited 28×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-05-23· cited 24×
• Commonwealth v. McIntosh
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-05-04· cited 15×
• Commonwealth v. Kline
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1980-04-25· cited 4×
• State v. Arne
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1981-10-23· cited 2×
• Commonwealth v. Scott
  Berks County Court of Common Pleas· 1981-03-11