Skip to main content
· 5/13/1907

Commonwealth v. Crow

Citations

  • 218 Pa. 234
  • 67 A. 355
  • 1907 Pa. LEXIS 492

Syllabus

<p>Quo warranto — Parties—Senatorial apportionment — Act of February 17, 1906, P. L. 31 — Constitutional law.</p> <p>A person claiming to have been rightfully elected to the office of senator cannot issue and maintain a quo warranto in the name of the commonwealth on his own relation, to test the constitutionality of the Act of February 17, 1906, P. L. 31, relating to senatorial apportionment.</p> <p>In a suit properly brought the Supreme Court has general jurisdiction to consider and pass upon the constitutionality of the Act of February 17, 1906, P. LI 31.</p>

Judges: Brown, Cueiam, Elkin, Fell, Mestrezat, Mitchell, Potter, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.