Skip to main content
· 4/23/1996

Commonwealth v. Cramutola

Citations

  • 676 A.2d 1214
  • 450 Pa. Super. 345
  • 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court does not conduct de novo review of probable cause determination, but rather is limited to determining whether there was a substantial basis for the issuing authority's finding of probable cause
  • defendant arrested for dealing drugs from her home after warrant was obtained as a result of surveillance
  • “[I]nformation provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause if it is corroborated.”
  • “[I]nformation provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause if it is corroborated.”
  • “The law is clear that information provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause so long as it is corroborated by police investigation”
  • issuance of warrant upheld where repeated controlled buy attempts failed because defendant refused to sell because she “did not know [the purchaser],” thought the purchaser “could be a cop,” and “did not have any [drugs], but told [the purchaser] to call in advance next time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Beck, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.