· 4/23/1996
Commonwealth v. Cramutola
Citations
- 676 A.2d 1214
- 450 Pa. Super. 345
- 1996 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing court does not conduct de novo review of probable cause determination, but rather is limited to determining whether there was a substantial basis for the issuing authority's finding of probable cause
- defendant arrested for dealing drugs from her home after warrant was obtained as a result of surveillance
- “[I]nformation provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause if it is corroborated.”
- “[I]nformation provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause if it is corroborated.”
- “The law is clear that information provided to the police by an anonymous source can establish probable cause so long as it is corroborated by police investigation”
- issuance of warrant upheld where repeated controlled buy attempts failed because defendant refused to sell because she “did not know [the purchaser],” thought the purchaser “could be a cop,” and “did not have any [drugs], but told [the purchaser] to call in advance next time”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cirillo, Beck, Cercone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.