Skip to main content
· 5/24/1906

Commonwealth v. Cover

Citations

  • 215 Pa. 556
  • 64 A. 686
  • 1906 Pa. LEXIS 847

Syllabus

<p>Taxation — Mercantile tax — Manufacturers—Tanners—Exemption.</p> <p>Where a tanner concedes that he manufactures leather in Virginia, and sells it in a store in Pennsylvania, the commonwealth has a prima facie right to the mercantile tax upon the whole volume of the business, and the burden of showing that any portion of the sales is exempt, rests upon the tanner. The fact that the leather is cut in the store into various sizes and pieces, but not manufactured into any complete article, does not exempt from taxation the leather thus treated, on the ground that it was manufactured into articles for sale.</p>

Judges: Brown, Elkin, Mestrezat, Potter, Ram, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.