Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Cote

Citations

  • 363 N.E.2d 276
  • 5 Mass. App. Ct. 365
  • 1977 Mass. App. LEXIS 647

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is . . . improper for a judge to . . . direct what inferences the jury should draw from certain evidence”
  • in a case where the evidence was not the same against both defendants, the judge said to the jury in the course of his instructions, “[I]t is inconceivable that you could find one of the defendants guilty and one not guilty”
  • jury were instructed to find both defendants guilty or both not guilty, but not to find one guilty and one not guilty; the instruction “amounted to a usurpation of the fact-finding function of the jury”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hale, Goodman, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.