Commonwealth v. Costella

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an ALJ’s failure to perform a factor-by-factor analysis was not erroneous where the ALJ “explained his rationale in a manner that allow[ed] the [court] to follow his line of reasoning, including stating the amount of weight given to th[e] evidence”
• holding it was proper for ALJ to credit opinion based upon psychological testing that was explained in a comprehensive report rather than two opinions that constituted conclusory checklist forms
• ALJ’s failure to perform a factor- by-factor analysis of the 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c
• ALJ’s failure to perform factor-by-factor analysis of opinion evidence in written opinion not erroneous
• ALJ’s failure to perform a factor-by-factor analysis was not erroneous where the ALJ “explained [her] rationale in a manner that allows the [court] to follow [her] line of reasoning, including stating the amount of weight given to this evidence”
• ALJ’s failure to perform a factor-by-factor analysis was not erroneous where the ALJ “explained his rationale in a manner that allows the [court] to follow his line of reasoning, including stating the amount of weight given to this evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).