Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Correa

Citations

  • 620 A.2d 497
  • 423 Pa. Super. 57
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 342

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the crime of possession of a controlled substances is not crimen falsi even though statute requires “knowing” or “intentional” possession
  • holding that prima facie case of discrimination was established where prosecutor used five of her six peremptory challenges to exclude black venirepersons
  • permissible to challenge based on fact that the venirepersons’s son had been arrested
  • evidence of arrest, conviction, and active bench warrant admissible to demonstrate a witness’s motive to avoid the police
  • arrest and conviction for possession of a controlled substance was not evidence of crimen falsi to impeach the appellant’s character witness, but it was admissible to show witness’ bias against police and that a bench warrant had been issued for his arrest
  • Powers decision eliminated two requirements of prima facie showing previously required of defendant under Batson: defendant no longer need establish that he or she is a member of a cognizable racial group, nor a member of the same group as that excluded through use of peremptory challenges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Popovich, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.