Commonwealth v. Connolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In order to present an issue of arguable merit premised upon counsel's failure to call character witnesses, it must be - 12 - J-S16014-25 established that: . . . the witness was willing to testify on appellant’s behalf at trial[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Schultz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-12-22· cited 18×
• Com. v. Holllabaugh, J.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2025-10-03

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-09-18· cited 185×
• Commonwealth v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-21· cited 91×
• Commonwealth v. Gray
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-05-11· cited 44×
• Commonwealth v. Smolko
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-10-10· cited 31×
• Commonwealth v. Choi Chun Lam
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-10-15· cited 29×
• Commonwealth v. Kellum
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-02-06· cited 17×