Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Coleman

Citations

  • 130 A.3d 38
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 258
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 814
  • 2015 WL 8677416

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that because a successful challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence warrants automatic discharge rather than retrial, we address that issue first
  • holding an anonymous tip that the appellant was selling drugs and had been cited for driving with a suspended license was a bare bones allegation that fell short of the quality and quantity of information required to corroborate a search of the appellant’s residence
  • finding sufficient evidence supported possession of drug paraphernalia where police recovered cocaine and digital scale
  • holding an anonymous tip that the appellant was selling drugs and had been cited for driving with a suspended license was a bare bones allegation that fell short of the quality and quantity of information required to corroborate a search of the appellant’s residence
  • “[F]or an anonymous tip to give rise to reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, it must be of sufficient quality that it may be found reliable.”
  • “Since a sufficiency claim warrants automatic discharge rather than retrial, we address -4- J-A26002-18 that issue at the outset.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Olson, Stabile

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.