Commonwealth v. Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a detective's video narration “was relevant to the jury's understanding of the timing, the actors, and the location of events depicted in the video.”
• remanding for resentencing where appellant was sentenced to mandatory minimum pursuant to Section 9712
• trial court did not err in admitting video evidence and accompanying narration by police officer, where evidence was relevant, not unduly prejudicial, and would not mislead the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Com. v. Cole, T.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-01-24· cited 17×
• Com. v. Cole
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-07-26

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alleyne v. United States
  Supreme Court· 2013-06-17· cited 5,868×
• Commonwealth v. Sneed
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-06-04· cited 398×
• Commonwealth v. Valentine
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-10-03· cited 340×
• Commonwealth v. Drumheller
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-09-20· cited 254×
• Commonwealth v. Baumhammers
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-11-20· cited 216×
• Commonwealth v. Stallworth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-10-04· cited 157×
• Commonwealth v. Bradley
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-28· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Stark
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-05-20· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Bradley
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-12-14· cited 2×