Commonwealth v. Colandris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “allegations of interlocking directorates and stock ownership will not alone suffice” to support an alter-ego theory for jurisdictional purposes
• holding that the “mere fact that a subsidiary company does business within a state does not confer jurisdiction over its nonresident parent, even if the parent is the sole owner of the subsidiary”
• noting that allegations of interlocking directorates will not suffice to show that the activities of the subsidiary should be attributed to the parent
• finding that a corporate officer is liable for torts in which he personally participated in
• finding that a corporate officer is liable for torts in which he personally participated in
• “The mere fact that a subsidiary company does business within a state does not confer jurisdiction over its nonresident parent. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).