Skip to main content
· 12/20/1991

Commonwealth v. Cogswell

Citations

  • 583 N.E.2d 266
  • 31 Mass. App. Ct. 691
  • 1991 Mass. App. LEXIS 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting government’s burden of presenting some evidence that prosecu tion is not time barred but finding that “burden of proof for establishing that the statute has not run is be yond a reaso nable dou bt”
  • where defendant unsuccessfully moved to dismiss charges based on statute of limitations and trial judge, in connection with denying motion for required finding, addressed statute of limitations issue sua sponte, Appeals Court addressed statute of limitations claim on direct appeal
  • defendant abusing stepdaughters repeatedly, inducing silence by identical threats

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Dreben, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.