Commonwealth v. Coffey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we are constrained to construe statutes as they are written without adding or deleting any terms from them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Reynolds
  Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2013-12-17· cited 34×
• Commonwealth v. Maynard
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-08-07· cited 6×
• Gritton v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-12-04· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-03-29· cited 62×
• Keeney v. Keeney
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2007-03-16· cited 53×
• Hale v. Combs
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2000-10-26· cited 26×
• Gainsco Companies v. Gentry
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Fint
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1997-02-27· cited 12×
• In Re One 1985 Mercedes Benz Automobile
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1992-11-19· cited 12×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2006-02-10· cited 9×
• Hinkle v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2002-08-30· cited 8×