Commonwealth v. Cianci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that aggravated assault and REAP do not merge for purposes of sentencing because “each offense requires proof of an element that is absent from the other offense, and one offense can be committed without committing the other offense”
• holding that aggravated assault conviction under section 2702(a)(1
• finding that conviction for aggravated assault did not merge with REAP, and stating that the \relevant question in merger analysis is whether [a] person can commit one crime without also committing the other crime\ and if elements differ, merger is improper
• holding REAP does not merge with aggravated assault
• holding aggravated assault pursuant to section 2702(a)(1
• “Appellant’s reliance upon [Dobbs] is 3 Specifically, 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(1) focuses on officer observations, while 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(a)(2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).