Massachusetts Appeals Court· 3/19/2003
Commonwealth v. Charles
Citations
- 57 Mass. App. Ct. 595
- 785 N.E.2d 384
- 2003 Mass. App. LEXIS 342
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- kicking was \not so minimal as to foreclose an inference that the shod feet of the defendants were being used as dangerous weapons\
- where objection to charge was made and error was not harmless
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Doekfer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2002-03-22· cited 73×
- Commonwealth v. ClaudioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-06-14· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. MaldonadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-05-04· cited 55×
- Commonwealth v. FedericoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-09-04· cited 49×
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-11-05· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. StoteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2000-12-08· cited 35×
- Commonwealth v. MercadoMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1987-06-26· cited 33×
- Commonwealth v. ColonMassachusetts Appeals Court· 2001-10-04· cited 18×
- Commonwealth v. AugusteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-09-12· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. MelendezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-04-10· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. FernandezMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1997-08-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.