Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Charles

Citations

  • 456 Mass. 378
  • 923 N.E.2d 519
  • 2010 Mass. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant did not stipulate to the composition of the drugs
  • packaging of drugs in manner consistent with distribution insufficient to prove that substances were, in fact, cocaine and marijuana
  • although defendant did not contest nature of substances, defense theory cannot relieve Commonwealth of its burden of proving nature of substances
  • erroneous admission in evidence of certificates of drug analysis without testimony of analyst was not harmless beyond reasonable doubt where, inter alia, defendant “did not. . . stipulate to the composition of the substances”
  • rejecting the argument that defense counsel may “tacitly stipulate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, Spina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.