Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Chance

Citations

  • 458 A.2d 1371
  • 312 Pa. Super. 435
  • 1983 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2864

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that specific intent may be inferred from the words or the actions of the defendant in light of all attendant circumstances
  • holding that evidence was sufficient to establish that the appellant attempted to rape the victim
  • holding that specific intent may be inferred from the words or the actions of the defendant in light of all attendant circumstances
  • holding that evidence was sufficient to establish that the appellant attempted to rape the victim
  • holding that specific intent may be inferred from the words or the actions of the defendant in light of all attendant circumstances
  • holding § 2706 is not unconstitutionally vague because it describes “the category of unlawful activity with sufficient precision as to place a person charged with such an offense on notice as to what conduct was proscribed by the statute”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowley, McEwen, Montemuro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.